Lunatic Obama Halloween Insanity - Threatened Russia With War Over Alleged, Unproven US Election Hacking
If one wishes to believe NBC News’s "exclusive" report, President Barack Obama almost delivered the Halloween scare of all time on October 31, 2016, just a week before he accused Donald Trump of being "temperamentally unfit" to be commander-in-chief.
By Wayne Madsen for Rense.com
If one wishes to believe NBC News’s "exclusive" report, President Barack Obama almost delivered the Halloween scare of all time on October 31, 2016, just a week before he accused Donald Trump of being "temperamentally unfit' to be commander-in-chief.
On Halloween, Obama activated the White House's "Red Phone" (which is not a phone but a Washington to Moscow "hot line" communications link that was originally a teletype connection, then a fax, and, finally, email that provides a direct line to the Russian President in the Kremlin) and informed the Russian president that if alleged Russian hacking of computers tied to the U.S. election did not stop, the United States would respond with "armed conflict" against Russia.
Not since another fateful October, the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, had the United States come so close to an all-out war with Russia.
However, in the case of President John F. Kennedy, the presence of Soviet offensive nuclear-tipped missiles in Cuba were cited in U-2 photographic intelligence presented publicly by U.S. ambassador Adlai Stevenson before the United Nations Security Council.
In the case of Obama, the only intelligence he possessed that alleged Russia was behind hacking Democratic National Committee (DNC) computers was a secret report, not released to the public, ginned up by Obama's Sunni Wahhabi-crazed Central Intelligence Agency director John Brennan.
Obama, according to NBC News, warned Putin personally against hacking Democratic Party computers during the G-20 meeting in China in September.
When Obama, obviously urged on by Brennan, felt the Russian hacking was continuing, he sent a stark message over the Red Phone to the Kremlin, in part stating, "International Law, including the law for armed conflict, applies to actions in cyberspace."
While Obama and Brennan continue to refuse to present to the public the contents of the CIA's secret report alleging Russian hacking of the DNC, they had no problem revealing that Obama almost pushed the nuclear trigger on Russia.
Only a madman would resort to such action based on the flimsiest of intelligence from the Cold War-era troglodyte Brennan.
The only proof that the CIA and its contractors could offer up was that a group of hackers, known as "Fancy Bear", used an Android smart phone application developed by a Ukrainian artillery officer to target Soviet-era D-30 Howitzers that was purloined and re-purposed by the Russian military intelligence directorate against DNC computers.
Even Hollywood movie producers would reject such a script as too silly for film audiences to take seriously.
The Fancy Bear operation was concocted by a company called CrowdStrike, co-founded by a Russian-American named David Alperovitch, who just also happens to be a senior fellow at the CIA-linked Atlantic Council.
News articles about CrowdStrike strongly suggest it exists to ratchet up cyber-war tensions with Russia, China, and North Korea based on hyped-up network security "vaporware" products being sold at top-dollar prices to tech-ignorant government customers.
Obama sent his war message to Russia based on his "Fancy Bear" intelligence over a special email channel to reduce the risk of nuclear war resulting from cyber-security threats. This cyber-security email link was installed in 2013 as part of the hot line network linking by satellite the Nuclear Risk Reduction Centers in Washington, DC and Moscow.
Little did the architects of the nuclear hot line realize that it would one day be used to proffer a "Fancy Bear" scenario that could have led to nuclear war.
Obama was acting out on the policies crafted by the neo-conservative Cold Warriors who continued to dominate his administration’s diplomatic and intelligence infrastructures as they had those of George W. Bush. These same neocon circles saw hope in the presence on the Trump team of the arch-neocon war hawk John Bolton, Bush’s Senate-rejected ambassador to the United Nations.
Jennifer Rubin of The Washington Post, a fierce neocon critic of Trump during and after the presidential campaign, wrote of her wish for Trump to follow the advice of Fred Kagan of the American Enterprise Institute, a member of the infamously-neocon Kagan family and brother-in-law of Obama’s Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland, the architect of Obama’s "color revolutions" in Ukraine and Macedonia.
Kagan believes that Russia’s worst "sin" has been to "redraft the global order" laid down by the United States and NATO following the fall of the Soviet Union.
Kagan, Rubin, Nuland, and others in their neocon circle of war mongers hope that Trump will confront Russia militarily, as Napoleon Bonaparte had done in the 19th century. The neocons are not very good students of history, as the fate of Napoleon’s foray into Russia is well-known to even the most basic reader of European history.
At the very least, Kagan has called on Trump to set the clock back to the Cold War era of Washington challenging Russia militarily in all the world’s hotspots: The Middle East, Asia, and Africa. In another tip of the hat to the Cold War, Kagan recommends that Trump refuse to recognize the retrocession of Crimea, the result of an overwhelming popular referendum favoring such retrocession, "no matter how permanent it seems to have become."
That same line of thinking could be adopted by Russia, which could announce that it recognizes the independent Kingdom of Hawaii, regardless of its forced annexation to the United States in 1898.
If the neocons want to return to 19th century big power politics, so can Russia.
If the United States wants to continue to recognize Crimea as part of Ukraine, Russia can recognize Hawaii as an independent state and permit the "Hawaiian Kingdom Government" to establish an embassy in Moscow and accredit a Hawaiian government ambassador-in-exile.
While such a dramatic measure might have been considered necessary had Hillary Clinton and her neocon war hawks won the U.S. presidential election, Trump’s oft-stated desire for much improved relations with Russia should render moot such extreme diplomatic countermeasures.
So far, Trump does not seem inclined to listen to the parasitical neocons who have infested every recent U.S. administration since Ronald Reagan’s. Trump would be wise to seek the counsel of those of his advisers who are not even remotely supportive of neocon dogma.
Trump will face the problem of cleaning house of the neocons currently embedded in the CIA and State Department.
The neocon newspaper-of-record, The Wall Street Journal, has let it be known that the U.S. intelligence and foreign policy establishments should encourage anti-Russian protests by Islamic groups at Russian diplomatic missions in the Middle East and elsewhere. The paper appeared heartened by the assassination of the Russian ambassador to Turkey and the outbreak of protests by Islamist groups at Russian missions in Istanbul, Beirut, and Kuwait. The Journal wrote the killing of the Russian ambassador "was glorified throughout the region."
The neocons in the United States would relish encouraging jihadist groups to target Russian interests in the Middle East and elsewhere as they did during the Cold War when they nurtured jihadist groups to fight the Soviet armed forces in Afghanistan. That gambit led directly to the creation of the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and other terrorist groups.
This would represent a turning back of U.S. policy to the late 1970s and 1980s, an era that represents the halcyon days for the war-mongering neocons.
The White House continues to insist that Obama's Halloween war message to Putin sunk in, since the alleged hacking is claimed to have ceased on November 8, Election Day.
However, DNC acting chair Donna Brazile claims the hacking continued on and past Election Day.
If Brennan and his fellow war-mongers had actual evidence that Russia had been behind the hacks, then why do they continue to insist that the hacking stopped on November 8, when Brazile clearly claims they had not?
The easiest explanation is that the Russian government was not the source of the computer hacking events and they were being carried out by some other party or were invented by the "Fancy Bear" fabulists at CrowdStrike.
Perhaps some interests wanted an Election Day war to begin with Russia, which would mean a declaration by Obama of a National State of Emergency and a postponement of the election, as had occurred in New York City on September 11, 2001, the previous time the Red Phone was used by the White House.
Had Obama authorized a military strike on Russia on Election Day, the civilian U.S. government would have morphed into the shadow government, where the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of Defense's Northern Command would have replaced the U.S. Congress and the courts as the government of the United States.
It is likely that there would have never been an election, let alone a President-Elect Trump.
We just sent you an email. Please click the link in the email to confirm your subscription!
OKSubscriptions powered by Strikingly